Interview Photos Top cast Edit. James McAvoy Gnomeo as Gnomeo voice. Emily Blunt Juliet as Juliet voice. Kelly Asbury Goons as Goons voice. Mary J. Blige Irene as Irene voice. Julio Bonet Mankini as Mankini voice. Jamie Demetriou Moriarty as Moriarty voice. Chiwetel Ejiofor Dr. Watson as Dr. Watson voice. Leyla Hobart Policewoman as Policewoman voice. Ashley Jensen Nanette as Nanette voice. Matt Lucas Benny as Benny voice. John Stevenson.
Ben Zazove screenplay by Andy Riley story by based on characters by Kevin Cecil story by based on characters by. More like this. Watch options. Storyline Edit. Sherlock Gnomes Johnny Depp and his assistant, Dr. Gnome Watson Chiwetel Ejiofor , storm into London's natural history museum, where their nemesis, a pie mascot named Moriarty Jamie Demetriou , is holding gnomes hostage, planning to smash them.
After a brief battle, Moriarty is defeated by getting seemingly crushed by a dinosaur skeleton. While there, Gnomeo and Juliet are declared the new leaders of the garden. Noticing that Juliet has cast him aside to improve the garden, Gnomeo leaves to find a flower as a centerpiece, but nearly gets caught in a shop, forcing Juliet to rescue him. Gnomeo and Juliet return to the garden, but then find out that all of the other gnomes have gone missing.
Sherlock and Watson show up at the scene to investigate, and after Gnomeo and Juliet help them escape from a sewer flood, Sherlock agrees for them to team up. They're on a mission to bring every gnome home.
Rated PG for some rude and suggestive humor. Did you know Edit. Goofs During the arm wrestle the toy monkey has his arm ripped off, then a few minutes later, while they are dancing, the arm has re-appeared.
Quotes Juliet : A man doesn't make you strong, but the right partner can make you stronger. Crazy credits There is a short post-credits sequence, of sorts, in which the animated Gnomes form a 'Sherlock Holmes' logo. This logo is then teased by the animated Moriarty, who is then smashed by the magnifying glass of the logo and says "I hate you, Sherlock Gnomes. User reviews Review. Top review.
You're left wondering who it's for, and why you can't care enough to even be bored. You are left wondering exactly who 'Sherlock Gnomes ' is for, other than the pun-masters who came up with its title while presumably snickering for a second and then realising they have to spend literally years to make an entire feature surrounding their wordsmith handiwork.
See, it's not like any of the four year-old's this should be aimed at will get most of the 'adult' or referential humour or even know who 'Sherlock Holmes' is, much less care for his porcelain counterpart, and I'd even stretch to say that the 'potty' humour that's seen here is just too subtle to give kids a giggle, either. It simultaneously seems to aim too young and too old, failing to find its audience because of this.
It's not too big a leap to assume the character was only chosen due to the earliest of his stories being in the public domain. These pieces clash together and vie for attention in a bizarre way, both competing to control a film which should really be a sequel to its predecessor but can't properly be because it's not allowed to have time away from its new, essentially unrelated characters.
It therefore doesn't introduce children to the 'Holmes' character through his 'Gnomes' variant, in the way that 'Gnomeo' leads nicely into 'Romeo' even though the former is a severely watered down version of the latter, but still heavily borrows an amalgamation of elements from several of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's stories and uses them as fodder for clumsy jokes and haphazard plot elements.
It's almost as if you'd need to be a proper 'Holmes' fan to even understand most of these references, and if you're a fan you probably won't like this or its representation of the character - though, you probably won't see it, to be fair.
The piece also opens the world up in strange ways that make it feel closer to 'Toy Story ' in the worst way possible, a bad imitation losing its identity in every way it can. Chiwetel Ejiofor Dr. Watson as Dr. Watson voice. Leyla Hobart Policewoman as Policewoman voice. Ashley Jensen Nanette as Nanette voice. Matt Lucas Benny as Benny voice.
John Stevenson. Ben Zazove screenplay by Andy Riley story by based on characters by Kevin Cecil story by based on characters by. More like this.
Watch options. Storyline Edit. Sherlock Gnomes Johnny Depp and his assistant, Dr. Gnome Watson Chiwetel Ejiofor , storm into London's natural history museum, where their nemesis, a pie mascot named Moriarty Jamie Demetriou , is holding gnomes hostage, planning to smash them.
After a brief battle, Moriarty is defeated by getting seemingly crushed by a dinosaur skeleton. While there, Gnomeo and Juliet are declared the new leaders of the garden. Noticing that Juliet has cast him aside to improve the garden, Gnomeo leaves to find a flower as a centerpiece, but nearly gets caught in a shop, forcing Juliet to rescue him.
Gnomeo and Juliet return to the garden, but then find out that all of the other gnomes have gone missing. Sherlock and Watson show up at the scene to investigate, and after Gnomeo and Juliet help them escape from a sewer flood, Sherlock agrees for them to team up.
They're on a mission to bring every gnome home. Rated PG for some rude and suggestive humor. Did you know Edit. Goofs During the arm wrestle the toy monkey has his arm ripped off, then a few minutes later, while they are dancing, the arm has re-appeared.
Quotes Juliet : A man doesn't make you strong, but the right partner can make you stronger. Crazy credits There is a short post-credits sequence, of sorts, in which the animated Gnomes form a 'Sherlock Holmes' logo.
This logo is then teased by the animated Moriarty, who is then smashed by the magnifying glass of the logo and says "I hate you, Sherlock Gnomes. User reviews Review.
Top review. You're left wondering who it's for, and why you can't care enough to even be bored. You are left wondering exactly who 'Sherlock Gnomes ' is for, other than the pun-masters who came up with its title while presumably snickering for a second and then realising they have to spend literally years to make an entire feature surrounding their wordsmith handiwork. See, it's not like any of the four year-old's this should be aimed at will get most of the 'adult' or referential humour or even know who 'Sherlock Holmes' is, much less care for his porcelain counterpart, and I'd even stretch to say that the 'potty' humour that's seen here is just too subtle to give kids a giggle, either.
It simultaneously seems to aim too young and too old, failing to find its audience because of this. It's not too big a leap to assume the character was only chosen due to the earliest of his stories being in the public domain.
These pieces clash together and vie for attention in a bizarre way, both competing to control a film which should really be a sequel to its predecessor but can't properly be because it's not allowed to have time away from its new, essentially unrelated characters.
It therefore doesn't introduce children to the 'Holmes' character through his 'Gnomes' variant, in the way that 'Gnomeo' leads nicely into 'Romeo' even though the former is a severely watered down version of the latter, but still heavily borrows an amalgamation of elements from several of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's stories and uses them as fodder for clumsy jokes and haphazard plot elements.
It's almost as if you'd need to be a proper 'Holmes' fan to even understand most of these references, and if you're a fan you probably won't like this or its representation of the character - though, you probably won't see it, to be fair.
The piece also opens the world up in strange ways that make it feel closer to 'Toy Story ' in the worst way possible, a bad imitation losing its identity in every way it can. It's actually a little hard to put my finger on why I disliked this one as much as I did, for in theory it ought to be a harmless, if joyless, experience that can be watched passively, yet easily. It's not offensive, the voice-work is decent and so is the animation. There was clearly work put into the piece and the messages are important, if a little ham-fisted.
On paper, it is certainly far from the worst thing I've seen. Yet, I have a distinct distaste for it. I'm not angry, tired or still cringing about it though I was cringing pretty much every time Elton John came on in lieu of a musical score , and I wasn't totally bored while watching.
I think that might just be it, though: the lack of any real response. It isn't good for anything, not even putting you to sleep.
Pjtaylor May 8,
0コメント